Trump Insists Jordan and Egypt Will Accept Palestinians from Gaza, Despite Rejections

By Md Nazmul Hoque, Correspondent
Updated 01Feb2025

In a controversial statement that has sparked widespread criticism and condemnation, former U.S. President Donald Trump has reiterated his proposal to resettle Palestinians from Gaza in Jordan and Egypt, claiming, “They will do it.” This statement comes despite clear rejections from both countries, who have firmly opposed the idea of accepting Palestinian refugees from Gaza. The remarks, made during a recent interview, have reignited debates over the rights of Palestinians, the role of neighboring countries in the Gaza crisis, and the broader implications for Middle East peace.

Trump’s Proposal: A Controversial Plan

Donald Trump, known for his unorthodox and often polarizing foreign policy stances during his presidency, has once again stirred controversy with his comments on the Gaza crisis. Speaking in an interview, Trump doubled down on his earlier suggestion that Jordan and Egypt should take in Palestinians from Gaza, stating, “They will do it. They have to. It’s the only solution.” He did not provide any evidence or rationale to support his claim that either country would agree to such a plan.

Trump’s proposal is not new. During his presidency, he frequently suggested that neighboring Arab countries should bear the responsibility for resolving the Palestinian issue, often sidelining the need for a two-state solution or addressing the root causes of the conflict. His latest comments, however, come at a time when Gaza is facing one of the worst humanitarian crises in its history, with widespread destruction, displacement, and a collapsing healthcare system following recent military escalations.

Jordan and Egypt’s Firm Rejections

Both Jordan and Egypt have unequivocally rejected Trump’s proposal, emphasizing their commitment to the rights of Palestinians and their opposition to any form of forced displacement. Jordan’s Foreign Ministry issued a statement saying, “Jordan categorically rejects any attempts to resettle Palestinians outside their homeland. The Palestinian cause is a central issue for Jordan, and we stand firmly against any measures that undermine the rights of the Palestinian people.”

Egypt, which shares a border with Gaza and has historically played a key role in mediating conflicts in the region, also dismissed Trump’s suggestion. A spokesperson for the Egyptian Foreign Ministry stated, “Egypt’s position is clear and consistent. We support the legitimate rights of the Palestinian people, including their right to self-determination and statehood. Any talk of resettlement is unacceptable and contradicts international law.”

The rejections from Jordan and Egypt highlight the broader Arab world’s stance on the Palestinian issue, which views the displacement of Palestinians as a violation of their rights and a threat to regional stability. Both countries have long hosted Palestinian refugees and have been vocal advocates for a just and lasting solution to the conflict.

The Gaza Crisis: A Humanitarian Catastrophe

Trump’s comments come amid a dire humanitarian situation in Gaza, where over two million people are grappling with the consequences of years of blockade, military conflict, and economic collapse. The recent escalation of violence has further exacerbated the crisis, with thousands of homes destroyed, essential infrastructure damaged, and hospitals overwhelmed by the influx of casualties.

According to the United Nations, more than 70% of Gaza’s population is now internally displaced, with many living in overcrowded shelters or makeshift tents. The healthcare system is on the brink of collapse, with severe shortages of medical supplies and equipment. The World Health Organization (WHO) has warned that the situation in Gaza is “beyond catastrophic,” urging the international community to take immediate action to address the crisis.

In this context, Trump’s proposal to resettle Palestinians in neighboring countries has been widely criticized as tone-deaf and disconnected from the realities on the ground. Critics argue that such a plan would not only violate international law but also fail to address the root causes of the conflict, including the blockade, occupation, and lack of political progress.

International Reactions: Criticism and Condemnation

Trump’s remarks have drawn sharp criticism from international organizations, human rights groups, and political leaders. The United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) issued a statement saying, “The forced displacement of Palestinians is a violation of international law and their fundamental rights. Any solution to the Gaza crisis must respect the rights and dignity of the Palestinian people.”

Human Rights Watch also condemned Trump’s proposal, describing it as “reckless and irresponsible.” Omar Shakir, the organization’s Israel and Palestine Director, stated, “The suggestion that Palestinians should be resettled outside their homeland is not only illegal but also ignores the root causes of the conflict. The international community must focus on ending the blockade and ensuring accountability for violations of international law.”

Political leaders from around the world have also weighed in on the controversy. European Union Foreign Policy Chief Josep Borrell emphasized the need for a two-state solution, saying, “The only way to achieve lasting peace in the region is through a negotiated two-state solution that ensures the rights and security of both Israelis and Palestinians. Proposals for resettlement are not only unrealistic but also counterproductive.”

The Broader Implications for Middle East Peace

Trump’s proposal has reignited debates over the future of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the role of the international community in resolving it. During his presidency, Trump pursued a highly controversial approach to the conflict, including recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, cutting aid to Palestinian refugees, and promoting the so-called “Deal of the Century,” which was widely criticized as biased in favor of Israel.

His latest comments are seen as a continuation of this approach, which prioritizes unilateral actions over multilateral diplomacy and ignores the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinian people. Analysts warn that such proposals could further destabilize the region and undermine efforts to achieve a just and lasting peace.

“Trump’s suggestion is not only impractical but also dangerous,” said Daniel Levy, President of the U.S./Middle East Project. “It undermines the rights of Palestinians, alienates key regional players, and sets back the prospects for peace. The international community must reject such proposals and focus on addressing the root causes of the conflict.”

The Palestinian Response: Defiance and Determination

Palestinian leaders and activists have responded to Trump’s proposal with defiance and determination, reaffirming their commitment to their homeland and their right to self-determination. Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas stated, “The Palestinian people will not be displaced from their land. We will continue to fight for our rights and our freedom, no matter the challenges we face.”

In Gaza, where the impact of the crisis is most acutely felt, residents have expressed similar sentiments. “Gaza is our home, and we will not leave,” said Ahmed, a 35-year-old father of three. “We have endured decades of hardship, but we will not give up on our rights or our land.”

The resilience of the Palestinian people in the face of adversity has been a defining feature of their struggle for justice and freedom. Trump’s proposal, far from offering a solution, has only strengthened their resolve to continue fighting for their rights.

Conclusion: A Call for Justice and Accountability

Donald Trump’s insistence that Jordan and Egypt will accept Palestinians from Gaza, despite their clear rejections, underscores the need for a more thoughtful and principled approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The Gaza crisis is a humanitarian catastrophe that demands urgent action, but any solution must respect the rights and dignity of the Palestinian people.

The international community must reject proposals that seek to displace Palestinians or undermine their rights. Instead, efforts should focus on ending the blockade, addressing the root causes of the conflict, and promoting a just and lasting peace based on international law and the principles of equality and justice.

As the world watches the situation in Gaza unfold, it is imperative that we stand in solidarity with the Palestinian people and support their legitimate aspirations for freedom, dignity, and self-determination. Only through a commitment to justice and accountability can we hope to achieve a future where all people in the region can live in peace and security.